I hope it's new Piapro-related.It seems I will be able to make a work announcement tomorrow
Wow, this is sort of weird news because it's a snow version of Shinkalion's Hatsune (発音) performing instead of "our" Hatsune (初音). I haven't been able to watch the show since it was around the 20 episode mark, I wonder why she would be performing plot-wise (because in Shinkalion, she is a sword-wielding girl who is also a girl of little words and is definitely in no way, shape or form having an "idol" personality--more like a tsundere).Miku will have a live scene on the Shinkansen Henkei Robo Shinkalion anime (song: Change! Shinkalion).Vocal arrangement by Mitchie M. @uncreepy I guess this was Mitchie M's announcement he mentioned yesterday.
I swear, I've been following Gatebox's Twitter and for a lot of their update posts, people have been asking when a Crypton/Vocaloid character would be available. I don't even think anyone other than Akihiko got to use the Miku Gatebox? Even though she was in commercials and that's the big reason any of us were following Gatebox to begin with.GateBox to end service for their first generation devices. Trade-ins will available for the latest model but there are no plans to bring Miku to these new models
^ I thought this comment was interesting in addition to the rest of the main tweet's comments.Real-life disappearance of Hatsune Miku
Wow, I wouldn't have expected that they'd get rid of Miku. I wonder if they used Sega's models in any way (Not that any of us probably know.)? That might have contributed, since CFM has changed their relationship with Sega, per the announcement last Mirai (I think.).Gatebox's article says you will not longer be able to use Miku OR Gatebox's mascot, Hikari, by April. I never thought they would get rid of Hikari!
A lot of people are confused why Gatebox is exchanging the new units for free, upset Miku is going away, and angry that Gatebox went back on its word of making "dreams".
^ I thought this comment was interesting in addition to the rest of the main tweet's comments.
Nah, Gatebox has their own model for Miku. The costume design was by LEN[A-7], and the module itself was their own making. (On the first demos they used Lat-type MMD model, since their own model wasn't ready yet).Wow, I wouldn't have expected that they'd get rid of Miku. I wonder if they used Sega's models in any way (Not that any of us probably know.)?
I'm curious, what are you referring to exactly? I don't remember hearing anything suggesting a change in relations.That might have contributed, since CFM has changed their relationship with Sega, per the announcement last Mirai (I think.).
Thanks, that's interesting! Even in that case, they would have needed to license Miku's image from CFM, but still, it's interesting that they made their own.Nah, Gatebox has their own model for Miku. The costume design was by LEN[A-7], and the module itself was their own making. (On the first demos they used Lat-type MMD model, since their own model wasn't ready yet).
Hm, around the time the new Piapro got announced, I thought another announcement came out that CFM wasn't going to use Sega to provide the Cryptonloid holgrams anymore. It seemed like a crazy thing for a vocal synth company to take on doing that themselves, too, but it fit if they were trying to bring more of the responsibility/ownership of producing their concerts in-house. I remember seeing a Twitter thread full of surprised/distraught reactions (One of them was like, "Miku and Sega aren't together anymore? My world is ending."), and maybe a post here, too? (I haven't been able to find that post, though.)I'm curious, what are you referring to exactly? I don't remember hearing anything suggesting a change in relations.
That's interesting, too. I knew the Gatebox could be controlled remotely in some ways--for instance, Miku was switched into a cherry blossom outfit when spring started or something at one point. But this seems to indicate that the company that makes the Gatebox can actually go and remove existing users' virtual companions. So it's not just that they're not making new Gateboxes with Miku/Hikari as options; the avatars are centralized with Gatebox HQ and are actually being intentionally removed. Depending on how the tech works, I guess that may/may not indicate a greater sense of urgency to remove them on the part of the Gatebox company.He basically said "it's very disappointing, but I have big Miku and my plushies".
All I ever saw was some people drawing premature conclusions from the fact that Crypton was developing their R3 model for concert use (and using it for a handful of songs at this years Mirai). Some people thought that it means Crypton and Sega aren't in good terms with each other. To me that sounds silly since Sega and Crypton are putting out two new games next year (Mega39's and Project Sekai).Hm, around the time the new Piapro got announced, I thought another announcement came out that CFM wasn't going to use Sega to provide the Cryptonloid holgrams anymore. It seemed like a crazy thing for a vocal synth company to take on doing that themselves, too, but it fit if they were trying to bring more of the responsibility/ownership of producing their concerts in-house. I remember seeing a Twitter thread full of surprised/distraught reactions (One of them was like, "Miku and Sega aren't together anymore? My world is ending."), and maybe a post here, too? (I haven't been able to find that post, though.)
This is what I thought too. The way Gatebox was marketed as a virtual companion, a decision to get rid of the characters previously offered seems dumb. If their marketing strategy remains the same with their new model, who wants to buy a virtual girlfriend knowing that Gatebox might just some day pull the plug and your virtual girlfriend's gone/replaced by a new character?(Not even to mention how upset the other Gatebox users will be. Gatebox is really being marketed as a virtual girlfriend platform. Wouldn't you think that most people who pick one up have a particular desired companion in mind? Once that avatar is gone, they're left with a...what was it again?...roughly $1400 USD paperweight.)
Thanks hamano! I think I might have found that post I was talking about here (At least the one from VVN; the one on Twitter is lost where I'll likely never find it again.). But it really doesn't say anything other than that CFM is starting to move from the Sega hologram models to their own R3 model. Regardless, I think we're both actually saying the same thing. Even if CFM moves to the R3 model they developed, there's no reason to think that Sega and CFM aren't on good terms anymore. Like you mentioned, they do have a number of games coming out :) .All I ever saw was some people drawing premature conclusions from the fact that Crypton was developing their R3 model for concert use (and using it for a handful of songs at this years Mirai). Some people thought that it means Crypton and Sega aren't in good terms with each other. To me that sounds silly since Sega and Crypton are putting out two new games next year (Mega39's and Project Sekai).
The main point of R3 in my opinion isn't trying to push Sega out of the live shows. This is just hearsay, but I'm under the impression that Sega models require a decent amount of fine tuning the motion capture data, and that R3 would need much less work, meaning it's easier to introduce new choreographies to live shows. (Again, there's no proper source to back that up, so take ot with a grain of salt). Additionally, the Sega models used in concerts are aging, so I think they want to start slowly upgrading to new models (Sega atm probably can't/doesn't even want to develop a new model since part of their Project Diva department was working on other game series, and they're not currently developing a game with new graphics (Mega39's uses the (Arcade) Future Tone models with toon shading).
But yeah, I'm quite certain there was no announcements of Sega and Crypton parting ways, just overreaction and confusion from some fans.
Exactly. Unless they have some pressing technological/legal reason for removing Miku/Hikari, it's hard for me to imagine how they could have greenlighted the decision to remove them as a good idea.This is what I thought too. The way Gatebox was marketed as a virtual companion, a decision to get rid of the characters previously offered seems dumb. If their marketing strategy remains the same with their new model, who wants to buy a virtual girlfriend knowing that Gatebox might just some day pull the plug and your virtual girlfriend's gone/replaced by a new character?