• We're currently having issues with our e-mail system. Anything requiring e-mail validation (2FA, forgotten passwords, etc.) requires to be changed manually at the moment. Please reach out via the Contact Us form if you require any assistance.

SynthV Synthesizer V Studio 2

morrysillusion

v flower enthusiast
Jul 14, 2018
919
Socal
morrysillusion.net
im curious what flaws people think they have? ive at least used solaria most and i cant say i have any issues with her tbh. sv2 has a few minor issues outside of specific voices of course. ive at least found the quality improvements that already exist to have been worth the upgrades regardless tbh
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alphonse

lIlI

Staff member
Administrator
Apr 6, 2018
1,036
The Lightning Strike
im curious what flaws people think they have? ive at least used solaria most and i cant say i have any issues with her tbh. sv2 has a few minor issues outside of specific voices of course. ive at least found the quality improvements that already exist to have been worth the upgrades regardless tbh
The main complaints I've seen are that Solaria and Saros have less impactful belting, with Saros exhibiting more engine noise and vocal modes that behave strangely. Asterian has received the fewest complaints, whereas reviews for Nyl 2 are the most scathing, with the general consensus being that their performance has significantly worsened across the board. One issue SynthV 2 seems to have is less controlled performances, chaotic pitch behaviour and aggressive shifts in the singer's power (this also comes up a lot with Moca 2).

Going off the SynthV wiki's solfeges, you can hear NYL's issues most obviously in their 'Emphatic' sample. It's extremely unstable on their 2 version (compare to version 1). There is, however, a lovely human quality to some of their other samples that I prefer to NYL 1, so I think the voicebank does have a lot of potential if its more extreme behaviours are reined in.
 
Last edited:

BANKARA_TEEvie

voxbox guy
Jun 24, 2021
52
nyl II currently has a lot of issues with engine noise and random artifacting in the vocals, an issue which i think has arisen simply due to the nature of how these new voices work - the same thing causing these issues is the same thing that, imo, allows the other vocals to have more of a human-like depth to them ironically. like you said too lili, some of those things that make them sound unnatural do also wrap back round to feeling natural, which is why i imagine it's an issue in the first place, and one that hasn't immediately been fixed (though knowing ES, i'm sure there'll be a solution)
it does make them a lot harder to use in my opinion, but the extensive nature of SV2's parameters also means that there's a lot that the user can manually do to work around - nay, even make soundgooodable (sorry) - these things, which i always believe is in the true spirit of vsynth

funnily enough, i've heard the opposite about solaria that her range and expression has done nothing but improve, but absolutely nyl and saros have suffered a bit of a hit in the switch-over - ironic that asterian is the most stable given how 'experimental' a low-octave ai vocalist technically is LOL.

(sorry if this is worded like crap btw. despite doing literature and linguistics this year at uni, i think my writing skills have really really deteriorated omg)
 
  • Like
Reactions: lIlI

lIlI

Staff member
Administrator
Apr 6, 2018
1,036
The Lightning Strike
It's very useful to hear your experience having used them hands-on! I wasn't able to distinguish the extra engine noise in the mixed clips I've heard; so that's good to be aware of. There's a lot of amazing nuance in SV2's output, which is partly why I'm so keen for the more problematic areas to be refined. I want to see everyone reach their potential.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 1, Guests: 3)