Did youtube analytics is broken or something? My videos only last for 4 minutes but YT show me average view duration over 7 minutes...
They're so busy for this oneespecially now youtube "likes" to slow down on purpose or going down on playback quality because of the whole "ad block thing"
You are correct, MP3 with lower bit rate (anything below 256kbps) will apply a High Pass Filter to filter anything above 17kHz because that area consume a lot of data space so it got cut out. However, it's depend on type of filtering, some old school conversion method use shallow filter and already start cutting from 15kHz but most standard filter usually apply brickwall like filter to completely remove anything above 16kHz.but from my experience, usually warmer sound can be a result of sound compression (for some songs it can give a warm effect, it really depends and is very subjective)
Every track has been turn down -6.0dB (Track C turn down by -5.5dB)
LUFS are very close to each other, loudness error only 0.12 LUFS (barely any difference) except Track C. . . i was purposely make it louder.
MP3 files is Varible BitRate
I do blind test myself so i wanted to share my choice too.
I have such a hard time to choose between A and C and in the end choose C because i feel this track is sound more "in the face" more energy and because of this i can hear miku voice better (even reverb tails) but it's quite difficult to focus what i should listen to because i do like what i hear so my bias start to consume me.
The true answer is:
Track A: RAW lossless WAV files with 100% sample to sample accuracy compare to CD i own.
Track B: Ripped off from this channel (uploaded around 12 yrs ago).
Track C: Is the same from track B but it's a trap with +0.5dB louder than other tracks.
I choose this song to do a blind test because it's easier to detect any difference and you got all usual piano, kick, snare, bass, lead guitar and miku. If i pick something like rock, metal, EDM it's practically impossible. . .