Honestly, things like this are exactly what's keeping me from believing the overall genuinity of the thread.
Let me be clearer, I'm not saying what has been said is fake and that Audiologie is a good company, at all, I do think some allegations could potentially be true and definitely not a good point on their part, but there are some contradictions in the thread which doesn't sit right: the poster has said that he doesn't want to hurt audiologie and that he's there to inform people about what happened, yet there are posts like "all the people involved are really bad and sick, don't support the company at all cost", which are very difficult not to appear as a way to bring the company down by taking advantage of emotional response. Accusations such as audiologie being mean and double-faced towards ES (which have also been made "out of the blue" and in an unrelated way to what the thread was) really seem to me as a way to hurt the company, which goes way beyond the "I want to inform people" statement and has the inner risk of coming out as petty and ill-intended. I would really encourage anyone to take this kind of information carefully; despite all the good intentions, I don't think the way this is being carried out is the right way to do so which such delicate things and that things are getting derailed quickly. (again, I really hope this doesn't come out as an attack to the poster, I'm not in the position to state whether what's been said is true or not and, in any case, I'm truly sorry that their experience has been such a negative one; however, such statements are making me doubt about how information unrealted to objective facts is being given and how much of a personal point of view has been put into it)
